California SB 277 Passed Assembly Health Committee

Vaccines and AustismCalifornia’s bill to eliminate personal belief exemption for vaccines will move on despite growing dissension. Senate Bill 277 passed California’s Assembly Health Committee 12-6-1 on June 9th and is awaiting another vote within the state assembly. The bill will prevent parents from enrolling their children in school without receiving over forty doses of the ten vaccines deemed “necessary” by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (unless for medical reasons).

The hearing held prior to the Health Committee’s vote attracted concerned parents and doctors from across the state, many delivering testimonies of their experiences with children injured by vaccines. The controversy is rooted in the perpetual struggle between protecting personal liberties and promoting the “greater public good”; with proponents of the bill arguing compulsory vaccinations are necessary to safeguard against a widespread outbreak, while those in opposition are voicing concerns over the safety of vaccines, and others more than concerned about the constitutional violation of  personal liberties.

Somewhat ironically, co-writer of the bill, Senator Richard Pan (D-Sacramento), stated during the hearing that the bill was “about freedom” from disease. Pan was prompted by the December measles “outbreak” in Orange County, Ca. arguing “Vaccines are necessary to protect us. That protection has been eroding.” But not everyone shares his view that California’s health is in dire straits. Santa Monica pediatrician, Jay Gordon asserted that, “Our current measles vaccination rate is easily high enough to prevent school spread” of disease, and statistics seem to be on his side, as only about 140 cases of measles resulted from the outbreak.

The opposition has made some progress with getting their opinion across, and Pan has demonstrated some willingness to compromise. A recent amendment to the bill will make it easier for people seeking medical exemptions, giving physicians more power to consider family medical histories when signing off on medical exemptions. Still for many this falls short, ignoring the potential risk involved with all vaccines, as well as the violation of a person’s 1st Amendment right to freedom of religion, where many faiths advocate for abstaining from vaccines.

The controversy in California potentially ties into national vaccine law and the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, as more states begin pushing towards compulsory vaccination, it becomes necessary to consider just how difficult it could be for the court to handle more injuries caused by a higher vaccination rate.

The state of California has historically been a national legal trendsetter, therefore with this bill gaining so much attention, many states could follow suit.

Client Reviews
"Phyllis Widman and her staff are the type of people you want fighting for you. They are organized, tenacious, thorough and compassionate. They understand how to work with the government and medical communities. If you are lucky to have Phyllis and her team work for you, you will be successful with your case." Bob and Ann, Waretown, NJ
"I can sit here and write you a book about how hard she works for her clients. Long story short All around great lawyer highly recommended" Anonymous
"Phyllis Widman, and staff, after years of continuous working on my behalf, keeping in touch with me every step of the way, for years, was happy to inform me that we had won the case. It wasn't easy, but she never gave up. Always answering my emails, and on top of my case. If you are looking for someone you can trust, and have faith in her and her team, will try very hard to get the right and fair results for you." Jim S.
"I hired Phyllis Widman to assist me with the denial of my religious exemption for the COVID vaccine and employment termination by my employer. Phyllis was extremely knowledgeable and clearly explained to me about my legal rights and the legal process. I found her to be very efficient, organized, and passionate about her work and I especially liked that she really cared about me as a person and truly wanted what was best for me. I am very grateful to say, I did have a successful outcome. The religious exemption denial was overturned and I am back to work. I highly recommend Phyllis Widman." Kimberly R.
"Phyllis and her team took care of everything after my injury. When I was hurt, I was unsure who to speak to, as I'm quite young and typically "let things go." After a few recommendations and the first phone call I knew I was in good hands. I don't know where I'd be right now if I didn't make that simple first phone call. A thank you just isn't enough, but thank you so so much for what your firm does." Anonymous
"My experience with Phyllis Widman was excellent. I know that I would not have had the successful outcome that I did without the expertise and specialty training of Phyllis Widman. Phyllis worked tirelessly to make sure that my concerns were addressed, and my needs were met. Phyllis is extremely personable, friendly, comforting and very relatable. She is so well versed in the field of vaccine injury law. I am extremely fortunate to have found Phyllis for my case and would highly recommend her to anyone in search of a truly compassionate professional." Kristen M.